
A couple of cobblings ago, I raised the following question. Do readers of series want their main characters to stay at home? The general consensus was yes, BUT…. Within the BUTS lies the truth that these folks are teachers. How were these “BUTS” expressed?
Kaye Barley wants her main characters to stick close to home, but listed an exception. “I love it when Deborah Knott [main character in a Margaret Maron series] Knott takes us all over North Carolina.” Dave Bennett said he agreed with Kaye, but added that he also “loved to ‘travel’ with the protags.” Vicki Lane was on the stay at home side, but continued, “Elizabeth George or Dorothy Sayers can move around in England, however, and it's fine by me.”
So what are these readers saying about “staying at home?” Treresa de Valence said, “The character (with supporting cast) needs to stay inside their own world.” Pattie Tierney wants her “main characters to stay in their natural habitat.”
“Their own world” and “their natural habitat” gives “staying at home” a much broader meaning, gives room to Dave Bennett’s desire “to ‘travel’ with the protags,” allowing Kaye Barley’s Deborah Knott to “take us all over North Carolina.” It makes room for Chester Campbell to “enjoy a series that stays around home,” but “get a bang out of Jack Reacher who has no home.”
So is the real issue for readers not so much “staying at home,” but that the main characters stay true to the “world” or “natural habitat” where we first came to know and enjoy them? How far outside that realm can a character stray and give readers the same level of satisfaction and enjoyment?
Would a Jack Reacher read be as enjoyable if the next book has him settled down in Iowa, working as a truck mechanic and married to a widow with three kids? Would a China Bayles read be the same if we did not find her in Pecan Springs, interacting with family and friends, but traveling across country with a person who is more business acquaintance than close friend to spend time in a world of strangers?
Many years ago, The Old Cobbler suffered through hours of college classes in literary criticism. Some of the comments and concepts from those hours about why we read and what we should get from that reading still haunt my brain, and seem as silly as when I first heard them. The folks at DorothyL make a lot more sense, are a lot more enjoyable, and make me think more much more than did a couple of college professors with doctorates in English Lit.




